Red, theory; black, fact
Each post presents a science theory I thought of. I am in my seventies and have two science degrees and six peer-reviewed publications.
Saturday, January 18, 2025
#74. Protein Batteries and Protein Misfolding Diseases [biochemistry]
Sunday, December 29, 2024
#73. The Self-exciting Small-world Network in Behavioral States and Disease [Neuroscience, Biochemistry]
![]() |
| Seen at the Red Roots Trading Co. |
Disclaimer
Conventional Thinking on the Nature of Cancer
An Alternative Explanation of Cancer Refractoriness
This seems possible in terms of a “cancer state” that is sustained by re-entrant (circulating) metabolic signaling pathways that form a small-world network (SWN). Curing the cancer requires extinguishing the reentrant activity, but this is difficult because of the robustness of the SWN. If one node in the network is pharmacologically ablated, the signaling can always flow around it by alternative pathways through the network. Thus, robustness becomes refractoriness.
Hub Nodes
The robustness of SWNs depends on their hub nodes—nodes with an unusually large number of connections. The state theory of cancer articulated here therefore directs us to pharmacologically target the hub nodes for greatest therapeutic efficacy. However, a practical therapy also requires selectivity. If we make the leap to assuming that all cellular actions involve entering and leaving states, that all states are identifiable with particular re-entrant SWNs, and that due to the parsimony of evolution, there is much overlap among SWNs and sharing of nodes, it seems possible that the set of hub nodes of a particular SWN can be used as a biochemical address for that SWN, leading to the desired selectivity. The other overlapping SWNs in the treated cell can survive the loss of only one or two hub nodes due to treatment, but not the targeted SWN, which loses all of them.
Problems with the Facts
However, these ideas predict zero response to a single drug, not a large but temporary response. Progress in resolving this will involve consideration of state-trait relationships. For example, a predilection for entering a particular state could be a genetically determined trait, and some states could exist that suppress DNA repair, leading to increasing genetic diversity. Lack of selectivity of anticancer drugs could also be a factor, so that the same drug could delete multiple hub nodes but not all of them.
SWNs in the Brain
Behavioral states such as aggression and siege mentality (the foibles of, respectively, capitalism and communism) also show refractoriness that may have the same cause. In these cases, some likely hub nodes are the neuromodulatory cell groups of the brainstem. An example is the locus ceruleus (LC), which distributes noradrenalin widely in the brain. (Noradrenalin is also the postganglionic transmitter of most of the sympathetic nervous system.) The existence of disciplines such as meditation suggests that some of the SWNs incorporating the LC also incorporate hub nodes in cerebral regions accessible to consciousness, probably including the brain’s language areas. More visceral hub nodes such as blood sugar level are probably also included.
Ancient Foreshadowings of this Theory
The need to treat multiple hub nodes simultaneously to extinguish maladaptive reentrant signaling may have been stated before, but in proto-scientific terms:
“Put on the whole armour of God…”
Saint Paul
Monday, December 12, 2022
#70. How the Cerebellum May Adjust the Gains of Reflexes [neuroscience]
Red, theory; black,
fact
Background on the cerebellum
The sensory inputs to
the cerebellum are the mossy fibers, which drive the granule cells of the
cerebellar cortex, whose axons are the parallel fibers. The spatial arrangement
of the parallel fibers suggests a bundle of raw spaghetti or the bristles of a
paint brush. These synapse on Purkinje cells at synapses that are probably
plastic and thus capable of storing information. The Purkinje (pur-kin-gee) cells are the
output cells of the cerebellar cortex. Thus, the synaptic inputs to these cells
are a kind of watershed at which stimulus data becomes response data. The
granule-cell axons are T-shaped: one arm of the T goes medial (toward the
midplane of the body) and the other arm goes lateral (the opposite). Both arms
are called parallel fibers. Parallel fibers are noteworthy for not being
myelinated; the progress of nerve impulses through them is therefore steady and not by
jumps. The parallel fibers thus
resemble a tapped delay line, and Desmond and Moore proposed this
in 1988.
The space-time
graph of one granule-cell impulse entering the parallel-fiber array is thus
V-shaped, and the omnibus graph is a lattice, or trellis, of intersecting
Vs.
The cerebellar cortex
is also innervated by climbing fibers, which are the axons of neurons in the
inferior olive of the brainstem. These carry motion error signals and play a
teacher role, teaching the Purkinje cells to avoid the error in future. Many
error signals over time install specifications for physical performances in the
cerebellar cortex. The inferior olivary neurons are all electrically connected
by gap junctions, which allows rhythmic waves of excitation to roll through the
entire structure. The climbing fibers only fire on the crests of these waves.
Thus, the spacetime view of the cortical activity features climbing fiber
impulses that cluster into diagonal bands. I am not sure what all this adds up to,
but what would be cute?
A space-time theory
Cute would be to have
the climbing fiber diagonals parallel to half of the parallel-fiber diagonals
and partly coinciding with the half with the same slope. Two distinct motor
programs could therefore be stored in the same cortex depending on the
direction of travel of the olivary waves. This makes sense, because each action
you make has to be undone later, but not necessarily at the same speed or force.
The same region of cortex might therefore store an action and it’s recovery.
The delay-line theory revisited
As the parallel-fiber
impulses roll along, they pass various Purkinje cells in order. If the response
of a given Purkinje cell to the parallel-fiber action potential is either to
fire or not fire one action potential, then the timing of delivery of
inhibition to the deep cerebellar neurons could be controlled very precisely by
the delay-line effect. (The Purkinje cells are inhibitory.) The output of the
cerebellum comes from relatively small structures called the deep cerebellar
nuclei, and there is a great convergence of Purkinje-cell axons on them, which
are individually connected by powerful multiple synapses. If the inhibition
serves to curtail a burst of action potentials in the deep-nucleus neuron triggered by a mossy-fiber
collateral, then the number of action potentials in the burst could be
accurately controlled. Therefore, the gain of a single-impulse reflex loop
passing through the deep cerebellar nucleus could be accurately controlled.
Accuracy in gains would plausibly be observed as accuracy in the rate, range,
and force of movements, thus explaining how the cerebellum contributes to the
control of movement. (Accuracy in the ranges of ballistic motions may depend on
the accuracy of a ratio of gains in the reflexes ending in agonist vs.
antagonist muscles.)
Control of the learning process
If a Purkinje cell
fires too soon, the burst in the deep-nucleus neuron will be curtailed
too soon, and the gain of the reflex loop will therefore be too low. The firing
of the Purkinje cell will also disinhibit a spot in the inferior olive due to inhibitory
feedback from the deep nucleus to the olive. I conjecture that if a movement
error is subsequently detected somewhere in the brain, this results in a burst
of synaptic release of some monoamine neuromodulator into the inferior olive, which
potentiates the firing of any recently-disinhibited olivary cell. On the next
repetition of the faulty reflex, that olivary cell reliably fires, causing
long-term depression of concurrently active parallel fiber synapses. Thus, the
erroneous Purkinje cell firing is not repeated. However, if the firing of some
other Purkinje cell hits the sweet spot, this success is detected somewhere in
the brain and relayed via monoamine inputs to the cerebellar cortex where the signal
potentiates the recently-active parallel-fiber synapse responsible, making the
postsynaptic Purkinje cell more likely to fire in the same context in future.
Purkinje cell firings that are too late are of lesser concern, because their
effect on the deep nucleus neuron is censored by prior inhibition. Such post-optimum
firings occurring early in learning will be mistaken for the optimum and thus
consolidated, but these consolidations can be allowed to accumulate randomly
until the optimum is hit.
Role of other motor structures
Photo by Robina Weermeijer on Unsplash
Wednesday, June 30, 2021
#63. How Noncoding RNA May Work [chemistry]
Red, theory; black, fact
![]() |
| Back, DNA; red, long noncoding RNA; green, transcription complex. A loop closes through an RNA running from bottom to top (not shown). |
No junk DNA
Role of long non-coding RNA
Background on control of gene transcription
A neuron-inspired theory of long non-coding RNA
Sunday, December 6, 2020
#61. Consciousness is Google Searches Within Your Brain [neuroscience]
Red, theory; black, fact
| The brain is like this because the long connections define the computations. |
The Google search is too good a trick for Nature to miss and she didn't, and it's called consciousness.
Brain mechanism of consciousness
I conjecture that the human brain launches something like a Google search each time an attentional focus develops. This is not necessarily a literal focus of activity on the cortex; it is almost certainly a sub-network activation. The sub-net activity relays through the prefrontal cortex and then back to sensory cortex, where it activates several more sub-nets; each of these, in turn, activates further sub-nets via the prefrontal relay, and so on, exponentially. At each stage, however, the degree of activation declines, thereby keeping the total cortical activation limited.
Accounting for subjective experience
The first-generation associations are likely to be high in the search rankings, and thus subjectively "close" to the triggering attentional focus and relatively strongly in consciousness, although still in the penumbra that is subjectively "around" the attentional focus. Lower-ranking search results would form a vast crowd of associations only dimly in consciousness, but would give conscious experience its richness. Occasionally, an association far out in the penumbra will be just what you are looking for and will therefore be promoted to the next attentional focus: you get an idea.
The role of emotions
This system would allow a mammal to converge everything it knows on every task, rather than having to perform as a blinkered if-then machine.
Brain mechanisms and our evolutionary history
Why should we have this back-and-forthing between the prefrontal cortex and the sensory association cortex? Two possible explanations are: 1) The backward projections serve a priming function, getting certain if-then rules closer to firing threshold in a context-sensitive manner; 2) This action is a uniquely human adaptation for our ecological niche as environment modifiers.
In ordinary tool use and manufacturing dating back to Homo habilis, the built thing is smaller than the builder's body, but in environment modification, the built thing is larger than the builder's body. Thus, the builder can only see one part of it at a time. Viewings must therefore be interleaved with reorientations involving the eyes, neck, trunk, and feet. These reorientations, being motoric in nature, will be represented frontally, and I place these representations in the prefrontal cortex. The mental representation of the built thing therefore ends up being an interleaved collection of views and reorientations, in other words, a simulation. The reorientations would have to be calibrated by the vestibular system to allow the various views to be assembled into a coherent whole. By this theory, consciousness is associated with environment modification.
Tuesday, June 16, 2020
#59. Neuromodulators as Peril Specialists [neuroscience, evolution]
![]() |
| Solanum dulcamara, a plant with anticholinesterase activity. |
“Life is difficulty.” -The Buddha Gautama
The basic theory
Table 1.
| Peril | Substance | Failure mode |
| Extremes of heat and cold | glutamate and GABA | ? |
| Predator | serotonin | depression |
| Parasite | histamine | phobia |
| Rival conspecific | noradrenaline | paranoia |
Social isolation |
Thursday, January 31, 2019
#48. The Reentrant-pathway Theory of Mental Illness [neuroscience]
Sunday, November 18, 2018
#44. The Denervation-supersensitivity Theory of Mental Illness [neuroscience, evolution, genetics]
![]() |
| Midplane section of human brain annotated with the Brodmann areas, which are related to different functions |
The Evolution of the Human Brain
Functional Human Brain Anatomy
Possible Disorders of Brain Growth
Differential Growth-Related Brain Disorders
Wednesday, July 25, 2018
#41. Corporate Sin [evolutionary psychology]
Friday, July 20, 2018
#40. The Sadness Cycle [evolutionary psychology, neuroscience]
![]() |
| Niccolo Machiavelli by Tito |









